Our Purpose
We operate as independent decision makers with the authority and responsibility to set standards for quality management, audit, sustainability assurance, other assurance, and related services engagements in Canada.
Our Mission
We serve the public interest by setting high-quality standards and supporting their effective application to address the evolving needs of Canadian interested and affected parties.
Serving the Public Interest
The public interest is an overriding consideration for all the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board’s (AASB) activities.
To guide the development of this Annual Plan, we monitor the environment and engage regularly with interested and affected parties. We serve a number of interested and affected parties, including:
- members of the public;
- users of externally reported information;
- boards and audit committees;
- governments (federal, Indigenous, provincial, and municipal);
- regulators;
- preparers;
- assurance practitioners, including:
- professional accountants, both from larger firms and smaller firms, and
- other professionals performing assurance engagements; and
- other interested parties.
Our risk assessment process helps us to identify public interest considerations that pose the greatest risk to achieving our 2022-2025 Strategic Plan. Our planned activities address the public interest considerations and associated risks. See Appendix A for a table of the public interest considerations and the related risks.
Our Strategy
The 2022-2025 Strategic Plan outlines our five strategic goals and supporting objectives. Our Annual Plan includes specific activities that will support the achievement of these objectives.
Our 2024-2025 Annual Plan is effective April 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025. This will be the final Annual Plan under our 2022-2025 Strategic Plan.
Back to top
Strategic Goal #1: Monitor and understand emerging issues in the changing environment to better anticipate standard-setting needs
Activities |
Monitor current trends and the evolving needs of interested and affected parties through the AASB’s emerging issues monitoring process. On a semi-annual basis, review the potential impact on standards. This will include considering:
- inspection findings from the Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) and the provincial Chartered Professional Accountant (CPA) bodies;
- financial reporting in emerging industries and changing business practices;
- sustainability and extended external reporting and assurance beyond the financial statements; and
- the needs of interested and affected parties for new or different services.
|
In executing the emerging issues monitoring process, understand, track, and assess the impact of emerging technologies on audit, assurance, and related services engagements using the AASB’s Technology Framework.
|
Monitor developments in sustainability disclosure standards, both in Canada with the Canadian Sustainability Standards Board, as well as internationally, and determine the AASB’s next steps in relation to the standards issued.
|
Back to top
Strategic Goal #2: Engage and collaborate with interested and affected parties to understand their needs and expectations
Activities |
On an ongoing basis, seek input from interested and affected parties, and review semi-annually the impact on standards. This may include specific outreach activities with different groups, such as:
|
Complete an engagement-process analysis on relevant projects at key due process stages to:
- identify the interested and affected parties;
- develop a tailored outreach strategy; and
- evaluate the outcome of the outreach strategy and whether sufficient engagement was achieved.
|
Seek input from interested and affected parties on all documents for comment.
Documents for comment to be issued by the AASB include:
- Compilations of Future-oriented Financial Information (FOFI) Exposure Draft; and
- 2026-2029 Strategic Plan.
Documents for comment issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) include:
Leverage input received on international projects to inform response letters to the IAASB by the comment deadline.
|
Monitor the pacing of all documents for comment, adapting timing or our approach to outreach as necessary to ensure sufficient and timely feedback is obtained.
|
Back to top
Strategic Goal #3: Set high-quality standards and guidance that respond to the evolving needs and expectations of interested and affected parties
Activities |
Participate in discussions with other national standard setters (NSSs) to strengthen relationships and international influence, as well as identify opportunities for collaboration. This includes:
- having periodic interactions with other NSSs; and
- attending IAASB NSS meetings.
|
- Explore a Canadian solution to addressing challenges auditors face in applying the Canadian Auditing Standards (CASs) to audits of LCEs, seeking views from interested and affected parties.
- Continue to provide input to the IAASB on all current International Standard on Auditing (ISA) projects on whether proposed revisions effectively deal with scalability and proportionality for an entity’s less complex elements.
- Issue an update to the Board’s previous communication, “Audits of Less Complex Entities – Our Progress Toward a Solution.”
|
FOFI
- Continue work on the Canadian project.
- Approve exposure draft.
|
*Fraud
- Provide a Canadian perspective as project continues.
- Respond to the IAASB exposure draft by comment deadline.
|
*Going Concern
- Provide Canadian perspective as project continues.
- Approve final standard.
|
*IAASB’s Position Paper on Technology
- Provide Canadian perspective as project continues.
|
*Integrated Approach to Risk Response
- Provide Canadian perspective as project continues.
|
*Listed Entity and Public Interest Entity
- Provide Canadian perspective as project continues.
- Respond to the IAASB exposure draft by comment deadline.
- Participate in discussions with the Independence Standing Committee on joint issues.
|
*Sustainability Assurance
- Provide Canadian perspective as project continues.
- Approve final standard.
- Review the 7000 series standards and consider whether the standards remain fit for purpose in circumstances where prospectus offering documents may include sustainability information subject to assurance.
|
*IAASB Project
Back to top
Strategic Goal #4: Enhance our standard-setting processes and capabilities to develop more timely solutions
Activities |
Develop a “Challenges with Standards Register” to log and track inspection findings and other specific issues, as well as identify and support actions (by the AASB or others) to address them.
|
Monitor the IAASB’s Position Paper on Technology to assess the impacts on the AASB’s Technology Framework , if any.
|
Monitor changes to the IAASB’s governance and operations, and assess the impacts on the AASB’s processes and influence, if any.
|
Monitor the Auditing and Assurance Oversight Council or its successor’s implementation of the Independent Review Committee recommendations and assess the impacts, if any, on AASB processes.
|
Back to top
Strategic Goal #5: Support the effective implementation and application of standards and guidance to enhance consistency and quality in engagement performance
Activities |
Complete an implementation risk analysis on all standard-setting projects. This analysis includes considering the nature, timing, and extent of guidance needed to address potential implementation challenges at the final approval stage.
|
Monitor and assist in the development of implementation guidance and other guidance by others, including other NSSs. Topics may include:
- group audits;
- technology; and
- sustainability.
|
Ensure visibility internally and externally of the AASB’s standards forward timeline to support effective implementation of the AASB’s standards and make revisions, where appropriate.
|
Back to top
Monitoring for Success
We want to make sure we achieve what we set out to do. We actively monitor our progress toward achieving the activities described in our Annual Plan. The AASB’s Oversight Council oversees our activities and assesses our performance for the year to ensure we fulfill our public interest mandate.
Back to top
Appendix A
Public Interest Considerations and Related Risks
|
Public Interest Considerations |
Strategic Risks |
I |
Assurance and related services standards should reflect the emerging business environment including technology.
|
The rapidly evolving and changing business environment including the increased use of technology by entities and in the performance of assurance and related services engagements, results in standards no longer being fit for purpose in the current environment. |
II |
Assurance and related services standards should be scalable, understandable, and proportional to audits of LCEs, to ensure the performance of consistent, high-quality engagements across entities of all natures and sizes. |
The increased complexity and length of recently issued standards, caused by an evolving business environment, may result in assurance and related services standards that are not fit for purpose in audits of LCEs. This may result in the inconsistent and inefficient performance of engagements. |
III |
Assurance and related services standards should meet the evolving needs of interested and affected parties who are increasingly using information outside the financial statements for decision making (for example, sustainability disclosure standards). |
The increasing demand from interested and affected parties for assurance beyond the financial statements may result in a need for new or revised standards or guidance. |
IV |
Assurance and related services standards should remain fit for purpose in an evolving work environment, including remote work arrangements. |
The evolving work environment, including remote work arrangements, may result in practitioners being unable to implement current assurance and related services standards. |
V |
Consistent implementation and application of assurance and related services across engagements. |
The untimely issuance of implementation guidance may result in assurance and related services standards being inconsistently applied. |
VI |
Readers of practitioner reports should understand the level of assurance provided and the role of the practitioner in the engagement. |
Users are misinformed as to the role of a practitioner in the performance of an engagement, caused by a lack of understanding of assurance and related services standards. This may result in users incorrectly relying on a practitioner’s report in their decision making. |
VII |
The AASB’s due process allows it to respond to emerging issues in a timely manner. |
The AASB is unable to respond to emerging issues in a timely manner caused by the time it takes to follow due process or the lack of formal processes to address rapidly emerging issues. This may result in standards not being fit for purpose in the current environment. |
Back to top